The 14th amendment in section 1 states:
No state shall deprive “any person” of life, liberty or property without due process of law, nor deny “any person” “within its jurisdiction” the equal protection of the law.
“Within its jurisdiction” means that the “any person” referred to is a citizen of the United States and of the state “in which they reside”.
Now section 1 also states:
All persons (any person) born (to U.S. citizens) or naturalized in the United States and “subject to the jurisdiction thereof” are citizens of the United States and of the state “wherein they reside”.
The same language is used in both federal and state levels. This is not complicated. You don’t have to be a scholar to understand. Using AI to seek information about due process and constitutional rights will only provide you with the extreme liberal view that is unconstitutional.
It seems very clear that this addresses citizens only. Continuing; No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of “citizens of the United States” nor shall any state deprive “any person” of life, liberty or property without due process of law nor deny “any person” “within its jurisdiction” the equal protection of the laws.
The application of the above rights was only recently applied to noncitizens in 1982 (Plyler vs Doe) when the Supreme Court made a horrific ruling and also in 1976 Mathew’s vs Diaz) , 1886 (Yick Wo vs Hopkins) and 1898 (United States vs Wong Kim Ark). Some of these rulings by the court focused on a specific group of people, (ex slaves, Native American Indians, and Chinese immigrants) and not all people and under unique circumstances that do not fit into the false narrative of rights for all illegal aliens.
In Europe currently there is no country that grants birthright citizenship (in Latin jus soli) In times past some European nations did have birthright citizenship but have since recognized the perils that come with it as people from other nations only took advantage of “jus soli” to basically rob nations of money, goods and services while having no allegiance to that nation. This is happening in the U.S. right now.
The preamble to the constitution states that the constitution is “to ourselves and our posterity” which definitely refers to United States citizens and their children only. It was NEVER the intention of the founding fathers that the United States constitution would apply to illegal aliens or non citizens or their children. The word “another” means another citizen. The word “any” means any citizen.
Tremendous harm has come to the nation because of erroneous rulings by the Supreme Court. Other examples of this are the overturning of Roe vs Wade, Plessy versus Ferguson and Brown versus Board of Education. Today the citizens of the United States are suffering due to a misinterpretation of the constitution. Has this grievous ruling by the court produced good fruit or did it open the door to the infiltration of millions of illegal aliens that refuse to assimilate into society and have no right to be in the United States to begin with.
If the United States is a nation of laws then why do so many citizens support the violation of them ? Don’t these citizens realize they will pay for the keeping of these illegals and in more ways than just higher taxes ? Illegals should by law be immediately deported and since they aren’t citizens have no rights to due process because they are not “under the jurisdiction of the United States” but to the country they came from as well as any children born to them. To give illegals constitutional rights when they violated our law to enter the nation illegally is an example of two wrongs not making a right, it’s stupid and dangerous to a nation’s survival. It’s a slap in the face to all legal immigrants that obeyed the law and became naturalized citizens.
Since President Biden opened the southern border and allowed this to happen he and all others involved should be brought up on charges of violating federal immigration law. Sanctuary states and cities use the supreme court’s erroneous precedent to protect these illegals from deportation falsely claiming that they are protecting their “rights” which they do not have. The only right they do have is to be deported.
Does it make any sense that our founding documents specifically give the rights under the constitution to “We the People” or “citizens of the United States” only then to say that “any person” or “another person” means noncitizens when both of these expressions appear in the constitution with respect to citizens only or their children under U.S. jurisdiction.
Illegals need to return to their own country and apply themselves to making it better rather than attempting to rob other nations of what their citizens spilled their blood for and poured out their sweat for.
If this situation is not soon corrected it will be one of the things that destroys the United States. All of this happened because 9 idiots in black robes didn’t have the common sense to understand what the constitution plainly says and means.
The Almighty GOD has said, Jeremiah 10:23 , human beings are unable to govern themselves and our history is proof of that. The only hope humanity has is the return of Jesus Christ.